|
|
|
Original Article
Stucco Work
in Architecture With Special Reference to Lucknow
|
Dr. Sanobar
Haider 1* 1 Associate Professor, History,
G.D.C Kuchlai, Sitapur, Uttar Pradesh, India |
|
|
|
ABSTRACT |
||
|
This paper examines the tradition of stucco work and architectural mouldings in Lucknow, tracing its evolution from the early precedents through the Nawabi era to its present conservation challenges. Lucknow's architectural identity stands out due to its lime stucco tradition. This craft was born out of geographical necessity due to the absence of building stone in the Ganga Doab area. Drawing on primary site documentation, scholarly literature, and conservation reports, this study analyses the material composition, stylistic range, and cultural significance of stucco work across key monuments like the Bada Imambara, Sibtainabad Imambara, Rumi Darwaza, Constantia (La Martiniere College) and some other monuments of Lucknow.The paper further examines the cross cultural dimensions of Lucknow's stucco traditions, arguing that the incorporation of European neoclassical mouldings within local craft frameworks most visibly at Constantia represents a significant instance of decorative syncretism in colonial era India. The paper concludes with a critical assessment of conservation challenges and policy recommendations for the protection of this endangered craft heritage. Keywords: Stucco, Heritage, Monument, Conservation,
Plaster |
||
INTRODUCTION
Architecture is a
valuable art of expression of human mind through the ages.1 It is also an
inseparable part of the history of any civilization. The New Encyclopaedia
Britannica defines ‘Architecture’ as the art and technique of building employed
to fulfil the practical and expressive requirements of civilized people.2
Architectural ornamentation has always been central to the style of
architecture adopted across cultures and civilisations. Surface decoration of
architectural edifices through carving, painting, inlay, and plasterwork has
served not merely as embellishment but as a primary medium through which
patrons, builders, and communities articulated identity, faith, power, and
aspiration. Among the many decorative traditions that define South Asian
buildings of heritage value, stucco work and plaster mouldings occupy a
position of exceptional significance, combining material economy with artistic
ambition to produce effects that rival and frequently surpass the grandeur of
carved stone.
This tradition of
surface decoration has been vividly exemplified in Lucknow, the capital of the
former princely state of Avadh. Under the Nawabs of Avadh, Lucknow emerged as
one of the greatest cultural capitals of the subcontinent, rivalling Delhi, Agra,
and even Istanbul in the richness and ambition of its architectural
achievements. The monuments of Nawabi Lucknow, its grand Imambaras,
imposing gateways, palace complexes, and residential kothis
stand as an enduring testimony to the ingenuity of local craftsmen who created
monuments of excellence, working without the stone resources that had
underpinned Mughal architecture, transforming lime plaster into a medium of
extraordinary decorative possibility. ‘Not Rome, not Athens, nor
Constantinople, not any city I have ever seen appears so striking and so
beautiful as this.’ (William Howard
Russell’s Diary)
This paper aims to
provide a systematic scholarly examination of stucco work and architectural
mouldings in Lucknow, with particular attention to the material compositions,
key monuments, and conservation challenges that define this tradition. It
further explores its relationship to earlier precedents, its engagement with
European neoclassical decorative language in buildings such as Constantia, and
its significance as a form of intangible cultural heritage which is currently
under severe threat of decay and destruction.
Stucco is a
versatile, cement based exterior finish applied to homes and buildings. It
consists of a mixture of cement, sand, lime and water, which is layered onto
walls to create a durable, textured surface. Modern stucco often includes
additives like acrylic or fiberglass for enhanced flexibility and weather
resistance. Unlike parging (which focuses on foundations), stucco is a full
wall exterior treatment used for aesthetics, insulation, and protection.3 In
ancient Greece and Rome builders used stucco to simulate the appearance of
marble on surfaces of lesser material, creating friezes, cornices, pilasters,
and ceiling decorations of remarkable refinement. Roman domestic architecture,
particularly in Pompeii and Herculaneum, preserves some of the finest surviving
examples of ancient stucco reliefs, demonstrating the medium's versatility in
rendering figural, floral, and geometric programmes.4 The Casa del Cripto portico in Pompeii, built around 40-30 B.C.,
showcases the growing use of stucco in coffered ceilings in ancient Rome.
The Islamic
architectural tradition inherited and furthered this practice, deploying stucco
for calligraphic friezes, muqarnas, geometric arabesques, and vegetal
scrollwork across the mosques, madrasas, and palaces of Persia and Central
Asia. Ilkhanid architecture occupies a distinctive
position in the history of Islamic art through the development of highly
elaborate stucco decoration. 5 The stucco decorations of the Alhambra in
Granada (fourteenth century), the Friday mosques of Isfahan (eleventh to seventeenth
centuries), and the Timurid monuments of Samarkand represent the apogee of this
tradition, demonstrating the extraordinary capacity of lime plaster to sustain
complex three dimensional surface work over large
architectural areas. Comparative analysis of Seljuq and Ilkhanid
stucco mehrabs reveals a progression from simpler,
repetitive geometric motifs to more complex forms integrated with vegetal
patterns, reflecting the innovation of Ilkhanid
artists while continuing prior traditions.6 In Ilkhanid
architecture, stucco decorations were common and they were even added to some
parts of preexisting buildings in this period. This helped to restore some
stucco detailing related to earlier periods, showing the prevalence and
importance of this decorative art at that time.
Stucco typically
consisted of crushed or burned lime or gypsum mixed with sand and water, and
was easily moulded or modelled into relief decoration for walls, ceilings, and
floors in both interior and exterior spaces.7 In Rome stuccowork grew out of
Hellenistic traditions which was a combination of Greek and Egyptian practices.
The ancient Greeks used lime plaster in relief on walls while Egyptians used
gypsum stucco for figural reliefs, freestanding sculpture, and other types of
objects. Adopting Greek techniques, Roman artisans used versatile, lightweight
white lime plaster for both elaborate stuccowork and fresco painting. Detailed
accounts have been provided
by authors like Vitruvius and Pliny, about this material which was expertly applied in layers
to create durable wall decorations.
|
Figure 1
|
|
Figure 1 Ilkhanid Stucco work |
|
Figure 2
|
|
Figure 2 Roman stucco |
The stucco
tradition was brought to India by the Mughals, where it was adapted to local
materials and aesthetic sensibilities. The most celebrated Mughal monuments
like the Taj Mahal, the Red Fort and the Agra Fort used marble and red
sandstone as their primary decorative surfaces. Stucco was used for interior
decoration, secondary structures, and in regions where stone was less readily
available. It was in this tradition that the architects of Avadh developed a
distinctive style for the Nawabi structures. The architectural genius of the
architects and builders of Lucknow was also born out of geographical necessity.
Unlike Delhi or Agra, the Gangetic plains surrounding Lucknow offered no
accessible building stone. The builders of Nawabi Avadh used a specialised type
of thin burnt clay brick known as the lakhauri brick.
These flat, rectangular bricks, measuring approximately 100mm x 150mm x 20mm,
were produced in enormous quantities their name itself derives from the fact
that they were manufactured in lakhs in open kilns called pajawa.8 The use of
stacked layers of lakhauri bricks, rather than single
large blocks, also provided structural resilience against the seismic activity
characteristic of the Gangetic plain, which is evident in the present times
with the long term survival of Lucknow's
monuments.
|
Figure 3
|
|
Figure 3 The Stucco work on
some buildings of Lucknow |
The second
essential component of the Lucknow building tradition was a finely prepared
lime plaster, applied as both a structural mortar and a decorative finish. This
stucco was composed of lime derived from crushed shells or locally quarried
limestone, mixed with a range of binding and strengthening agents. This stucco
was made from lime (derived from shells or limestone) mixed with various
binding agents. It is reported by various sources that there were between
eighteen and twenty five ingredients in the mixture for Lucknow's lime plaster,
varying from artisan to artisan and place to place, a diversity that reflects
the empirical, craft based nature of the knowledge involved.9 The most commonly
used mixture included lime, sand, crushed brick aggregate (surkhi),
pulses, jaggery, and various organic binders, producing a plaster of
extraordinary plasticity and durability. The exterior finish or chikna plaster was applied in successive layers, each
burned to a high sheen that closely resembled polished marble. This substitute
for stone was, in the buildings of Nawabi Lucknow, not merely a compromise but
an art form in its own right.10 In a departure from Mughal architecture, which
typically reserved lime plaster for interiors and used stone for exterior work ,
the Nawabs of Lucknow flipped this approach, using lime plaster extensively on
exterior surfaces as their primary means of architectural expression. The
decorative range of Lucknow's stucco mouldings is remarkable in its breadth and
sophistication. Craftsmen produced deep relief floral motifs, false arches and
false domes, running borders, fish emblems (emblematic of the coat of arms of
Avadh), geometric arabesques, calligraphic panels, and various hybrid forms
that blended Indo Islamic, Persian, Ottoman, and European influences.11 From
the reign of Nawab Asaf-ud-Daula (1774–1798) to that
of Wajid Ali Shah (1847–1856) a vast variety of stucco ornamentation was
produced and the monuments of this era therefore represent the fullest
expression of the Lucknow’s architectural tradit.
|
Figure 4
|
|
Figure 4 Lakhauri bricks |
|
|
The Bada Imambara,
commissioned by Nawab Asaf-ud-Daula in 1784 and
designed by the architect Kifayatullah, is counted as
one of the signature buildings of Lucknow and represents the inaugural monument
of the mature Nawabi stucco tradition. Its central congregational hall, believed
to be the largest arched hall in Asia at approximately fifty metres in
length, was constructed without central supporting pillars, relying entirely on
the structural integrity of thick lakhauri brick
walls and lime surkhi mortar to distribute loads
across a system of arched vaults.12 The Rumi Darwaza
showcases stucco mouldings on a grand scale, featuring intricate designs and
Ottoman inspired silhouettes reinterpreted through Avadhi aesthetics. The
Chhota Imambara (1838), commissioned by King Muhammad Ali
Shah, showcases Lucknow's coloured stucco traditions, featuring intricate
geometric and floral designs and gilded mouldings in Avadhi style. This use of
coloured stucco, with pigments mixed into or applied onto the plaster, is a
distinct aspect of Lucknow's stucco heritage. The gate of this Imambara has been subject immense neglect and apathy
leading to its damage and destruction.
|
Figure 5
|
|
Figure 5 The damaged stucco on Chhota Imambara Gate |
The Sibtainabad Imambara,
constructed by King Amjad Ali Shah and completed by his son King Wajid Ali Shah
located in the heart of the market Hazratganj,
presents a particularly significant case for the study of stucco mouldings in
Lucknow. The imambara built of lakhauri
bricks in lime mortar, lime plastered, and decorated with fine plaster
mouldings, has its
walls and ceiling decorated with intricate floral and geometrical
designs rendered in (vegetable) coloured stucco. Despite its architectural
significance, the Sibtainabad Imambara
remains underrepresented in mainstream conservation literature, though the
structure today exists as a live monument having been rescued after a long
struggle for protection and conservation. Perhaps the most intellectually
stimulating case study for the analysis of stucco mouldings in Lucknow is the
Constantia or La Martiniere College for boys which
was constructed by
the French army officer(East India Company), Major
General Claude Martin. Constantia deploys European neoclassical mouldings cornices,
pediments, Greco-Roman figurative panels, bas-reliefs, arabesques, and pilasters executed by
Avadhi craftsmen trained in the local lime stucco tradition. Constantia is not merely a curiosity of colonial era
architecture but a laboratory of decorative syncretism, in which local craft
knowledge and imported iconographic programmes were brought into productive
dialogue.13 The chapel of Constantia is a beautiful example of cross cultural
decorative richness, with its ceiling embossed with stucco art inspired by the
Renaissance style, and its stained glass windows from the European neoclassical
period all set within a structure built by Avadhi masons using local materials
and techniques. The exquisite ceiling inside the chapel, however was lavishly
decorated with bas relief images designed by artists working for Josiah
Wedgwood the famous English potter who is credited with the industrialisation
of the manufacture of pottery. Wedgewood’s most famous contribution is
Jasperware, used for different objects in pottery.14 The set of Nine Muses and
Apollo are the most popular image designed by John Flaxman. The Muses’ Bower is
decorated with profusion of bas reliefs, created in plaster of Paris. The
Chapel is a magnificent representation of the outstanding and exclusive
achievement of
craftsmen and designers besides the ingenuity of Claude Martin. Similarly there are many other monuments in Lucknow which
have stucco embellishments some defazed and some
totally erased. Stucco is the first layer to suffer the effects of natural
weathering, wild growth, inappropriate repair, and deliberate vandalism, compromising
the integrity of stucco surfaces almost across all of Lucknow's major
monuments.
The most harmful
practice which has
caused irreparable damage to these buildings is the modern cement plasters and
lime whitewash over original stucco surfaces, a form of insensitive repair that
destroys original decorative elements, introduces incompatible materials prone
to cracking and accelerates the decay of the underlying historic fabric.
Consequently, the restoration work undertaken on Lucknow's monuments frequently
lacks the specific knowledge and skill required for authentic lime stucco
repair, resulting in interventions and repairs that are technically inadequate
and aesthetically destructive as was the case with the Chhota Imambara repairs. Globally also the erosion of traditional
lime craftsmanship has been identified as a critical challenge for heritage
conservation, with UNESCO's 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible
Cultural Heritage recognising traditional craftsmanship as among the most
threatened forms of intangible heritage.15
However, for a
silver lining it is important here to note that several institutions and
heritage enthusiasts have made meaningful contributions towards the protection
of Lucknow's endangered lime stucco heritage. The INTACH Conservation
Institute, established in Lucknow in 1985, aims to restore and conserve the
vast repository of art objects, wall paintings, and ancient monuments,
operating a dedicated Lime Research Testing Unit and conducting monument
preservation, wall painting conservation, and capacity-building workshops.
INTACH has directly undertaken conservation work at the Hussainabad
Gates complex and has conserved significant collections at the Hussainabad Picture Gallery, Raj Bhavan, and Shahi Masjid
in Lucknow.
The Archaeological
Survey of India has undertaken conservation efforts at the Rumi Darwaza, though
the identifying and marking of cracks took months, followed by research to find
authentic material for repairs. This has been a complex task requiring multiple
layers of plaster applied meticulously to each crack. At the majestic Sikandar
Bagh, ASI commissioned refurbishment in early 2022 that restored sections of
the walls and ramparts using traditional lakhauri
bricks all this in the face of encroachments and concrete repairs that had
compromised the site's originality and distinction.
However, a PIL filed before the
Allahabad High Court in the year 2013 by Advocate S.M. Haider Rizvi for the proper
conservation of centrally protected monuments of Lucknow,paved the way for the emancipation of Imamabada Sibtainabad, which was
on the verge of collapse and extinction. Years of struggle and perseverance
finally led to the repair and renovation of this edifice which stands tall
amidst all challenges to its existence.It being the
first monument of Lucknow to get its heritage bye laws.This
PIL has highlighted a massive gap in conservation across the state of Uttar
Pradesh, demanding the adequate
protection and conservation of heritage monuments.
The responsibility
therefore rests on us all for the protection of our heritage. It is imperative
that the historians and scholars of history work towards producing systematic
material documentation of stucco surfaces and advocate the cause of Lucknow's lime
stucco tradition as Intangible Cultural Heritage under UNESCO's 2003
Convention. The concerned authorities must prohibit cementbased
repair on all lime stucco monuments and mandate authentic lime mortar in all
conservation contracts and activities. Establish a formal artisan training
programme to revive and transmit the craft knowledge of stucco artists. Also
promote the creation of
a dedicated heritage conservation fund for Lucknow's unprotected
monuments, modelled on the LDA's PPP initiative at Butler Palace. The Lucknowites must be made aware of the fundamental duty
under Article 51A(f)-‘to value and preserve the rich
heritage of our composite culture’ by reporting encroachments, participating in
heritage walks, and by not indulging in vandalism or scribbling on walls of
monuments and heritage structures.
In this regard
INTACH has gone a way ahead and recently launched a mobile app for heritage
surveys that allows any citizen to list a heritage property or site encouraging
community participation in conservation.
|
Figure 6
|
|
Figure 6 INTACH APP |
It would not be
wrong to conclude therefore that the stucco art of Lucknow is the fingerprint
of a civilisation. It a part of the rich cultural heritage of Lucknow exposed
to the threat of decay and destruction in need of protection and care lest it
disappears in to the pages of history. The monuments of Lucknow do not merely
deserve restoration. They demand it.
‘I never saw a
more beautiful panorama–the whole of Lucknow spread out before us, with its
innumerable fine buildings, gardens, gilded domes, and tall minarets–it was an
enchanting sight, and the air so fresh and lovely.’- Mrs G. Harris, (A Lady’s
Diary of the Siege of Lucknow)
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
None.
REFERENCES
Ameen, M. A. (n.d.). Architectural Synthesis in 18th-Century Lucknow. Kuey Journal, 30(1), 8581.
Author. (n.d.). Source-Author.
Author. (n.d.). Source-Author.
Enroute Indian History. (2025, August). Imambaras of Lucknow.
INTACH. (n.d.). Source-Intach.org.
Joshua Tree Ventures. (n.d.). What is Stucco.
Khan, N. R. (2014). Medieval Architecture of India: A Source of History (From 12th to 18th Century).
Lucknow Observer. (2021, January). Lakhauri Bricks.
Metropolitan Museum of Art. (n.d.). Roman Stuccowork. The Met Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History.
Metropolitan Museum of Art. (n.d.). Roman Stuccowork. The Met Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History.
The new encyclopaedia Britannica (15th ed., Vol. 8, p. 932). (1987). Encyclopaedia Britannica.
Tornos India. (n.d.). Muses in La Martinière’s Constantia: A Work of Wedgwood’s Neoclassical Art.
UNESCO. (n.d.). Traditional craftsmanship. Intangible Cultural Heritage.
|
|
This work is licensed under a: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
© ShodhShreejan 2026. All Rights Reserved.