POST-DIGITAL AESTHETICS IN VISUAL ARTS EXPLORING HYBRID REALITIES IN CONTEMPORARY CREATIVE EXPRESSION

Authors

  • Dr. Rubaid Ashfaq Associate Professor, Amity School of Communication, Amity University Noida, Gautam Buddha Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Pramendra Kumar Meena Assistant Professor, Department of Visual Art, Faculty of Design and Arts, Poornima University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • Amita Sharma Research Scholar at Department of Education, CCS University, Meerut, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhshreejan.v3.i1.2026.82

Keywords:

Post-Digital Aesthetics, Visual Arts, Hybrid Reality, Artificial Intelligence, Immersive Media, Computational Creativity, Audience Engagement, Human–Ai Collaboration, Digital Culture, Creative Expression

Abstract [English]

The rapid convergence of digital technologies, artificial intelligence, immersive media, and networked creative platforms has transformed contemporary visual arts, giving rise to a post-digital cultural landscape where physical and virtual realities increasingly coexist. While traditional and digital art forms have been extensively studied, limited research has explored how hybrid reality environments collectively influence artistic creativity, audience engagement, cultural interpretation, and aesthetic value. This study investigates the concept of post-digital aesthetics and examines the role of hybrid realities in shaping contemporary creative expression. The research aims to establish a comprehensive theoretical understanding of post-digital artistic practices and develop an integrated framework for evaluating artistic experiences in hybrid environments. A qualitative and conceptual research methodology was adopted through an extensive review of recent literature on post-digital aesthetics, artificial intelligence, immersive technologies, hybrid reality systems, and contemporary visual culture. Based on the identified research gaps, a Hybrid Reality Creative Expression Framework was proposed, integrating Physical Reality, Digital Augmentation, AI-Driven Creative Intelligence, Audience Interaction, and Cultural Interpretation layers. Furthermore, a mathematical evaluation model incorporating the Hybrid Reality Immersion Index (HRII), Artistic Engagement Function (AEF), Creativity Enhancement Metric (CEM), Audience Participation and Interaction Score (APIS), and Cultural Impact Assessment (CIA) was developed. Comparative analysis demonstrated that post-digital artistic environments outperform traditional and digital art paradigms across multiple evaluation dimensions. Post-digital art achieved the highest overall artistic value score (93%), audience satisfaction (95%), immersion level (95%), and interaction capability (94%). Hybrid reality platforms also achieved superior overall performance (92%) compared to conventional digital galleries and physical exhibition spaces. The findings indicate that the integration of AI, immersive technologies, and participatory design significantly enhances artistic engagement and cultural reach. The study contributes a novel theoretical framework and quantitative evaluation model for understanding and assessing post-digital creative expression, offering valuable insights for artists, designers, researchers, and cultural institutions.

References

Bae-Dimitriadis, M. (2024). Teaching Visual Culture in the New Digital Mediascape. Art Education, 77(4), 10–18.

Bagade, A., Mane, P., Rahane, A., Kaushalye, V., and Markad, V. (2026). Datastage: Automated Machine Learning Platform. Multidisciplinary Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 13(1S), 1–10.

Berry, D. M., and Dieter, M. (2015). Thinking Postdigital Aesthetics: Art, Computation and Design. In Postdigital Aesthetics: Art, Computation and Design (ch. 1). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437204_1

Boisnard, P. (2024). Prolegomena to a Post-Aesthetics of Artificial Imaginations (arXiv:2411.10467). arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.1046

Duester, E. (2024). Digital Art Work and AI: A New Paradigm for Work in the Contemporary Art Sector. European Journal of Cultural Management and Policy, 14(2), 1–18.

Escaño, C., and Mañero, J. (2022). Postdigital Intercreative Pedagogies: Ecopedagogical practices for the Commons. In P. Jandrić & D. R. Ford (Eds.), Postdigital ecopedagogies: Genealogies, contradictions, and possible futures (231–246). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97262-2_12

Ferreira, P., and Ribas, L. (2020). Post-Digital Aesthetics in Contemporary Audiovisual art. In Conference on Computation, Communication, Aesthetics & X (xCoAx). Graz, Austria.

Gutiérrez, C. (2024). Generative AI and the Arts: An Exploration of the Social and Cultural Impact of Generative AI in the Visual Arts (Master’s thesis). Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.

Imanova, F. (2025). Digital Aesthetics and Technical Innovation: A Hybrid form of Artistic Design.

Jeripothula, P., and Jamwal, V. (2025). Sketch & Paint: Stroke-By-Stroke Evolution of Visual Artworks. In Proceedings of the Relevant Conference/Book. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-92808-6_13

Kim, S., Lee, B., and Lee, W. (2024). Diversity and Stylization of the Contemporary User-Generated Visual Arts in the Complexity–Entropy Plane (arXiv:2408.10356). arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.10356

Klein, K. (2021). Post-Digital, Post-Internet: Propositions for art Education in the Context of Digital Cultures. In K. Tavin, G. Kolb, & J. Tervo (Eds.), Post-Digital, Post-Internet art and Education (27–44). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73770-2_2

Llioret, A. (2012). Cinema beings. In K. Zreik & R. Gareus (Eds.), PostDigital Art – Proceedings of the 3rd Computer Art Congress (121–128). Europia Productions.

Muthuraju, M. V., Saini, R., Khurana, J., Kaushik, S., and Anwa, S. (2025). AI and the Evolution of Post-Digital Art Movements. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 6. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i2s.2025.6736

Silva-Marchan, H. (2025). Visual Culture in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: A Bibliometric Analysis. Studies in Architecture, Urbanism and Cultural Heritage, 4(1), 1–15.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-24